home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In article <4euo6q$ko6@news.uit.no> kjelli@hstud6.cs.uit.no (Kjell Irgens) writes:
- > >> >subcribing/junking etc. I don't know what
- > >> >you mean by 'kludgy' Reply-To lines,
- > >>
- > >> Kludgy reply-to: lines in mail headers for people with dynamic IP-addresses.
- > >
- > >So -- you call it kludgy that GRn conforms to RFC-822? I don't.
- >
- > I call it kludgy that you have to resort to Reply-To: to get your mail to the
- > correct address, yes. Please explain me the advantages of this.
-
- You quoted the relevant part: conformance to Internet standards.
- As per RFC-822 From: is just that -- where a message is from. And
- Reply-To is where you wish a reply to go.
-
- I consider it broken to be done any other way. As do the standards.
- --
- // Michael B. Smith
- \X/ mbs@adastra.cvl.va.us
-